Most districts have done the hard work of defining a Vision of a Learner, launching performance assessments, or establishing a scope and sequence. But having a rubric isn't the same as having a shared, evidence-based performance standard.
A "Calibration Gap" often remains:
Do teachers across departments share the same expectations for quality?
Do students know exactly what they are aiming for?
Do we have a shared "strike zone," or are we grading based on individual preference?
Without calibration, even the best rubrics become echo chambers of individual interpretation.
Photo by Allison Shelley for EDUimages
Calibration is a structured process where educators analyze student work together to develop shared understanding of what quality looks like. Through facilitated protocols, teams examine real student work, discuss evidence, and build consensus on proficiency standards.
This isn't about standardizing student responses—it's about building reliability in how we recognize and support quality work. Using structured protocols, your team will:
Calibrate your "strike zone" for rigor and quality.
Practice facilitation moves you can bring back to your PLCs.
Network with peers to see how other districts interpret similar competencies.
Fairness depends on consistency, especially in flexible or competency-based systems. Without calibration, equity is impossible. Students deserve to know that "proficient" means the same thing regardless of which teacher, classroom, or building they're in.
Read my article Calibration Supports Quality for Flexible Competency-Based Systems on CompetencyWorks to learn more about this approach.
Join a small cohort of schools/districts for collaborative calibration sessions. Teams bring student work samples and learn structured protocols while calibrating with peers from other contexts. This cross-pollination strengthens your internal work and builds regional networks.
Best for: Teams ready to learn calibration processes and bring them back to their schools; schools wanting to validate their internal standards against external perspectives.
Format: Full-day or half-day sessions, typically 3-6 participating teams; optional follow-up coaching sessions.
Intensive calibration sessions designed for individual schools, departments, or grade-level teams. We analyze your student work, calibrate your expectations, and build shared understanding of quality specific to your context and competencies.
Best for: Schools building internal consistency; teams launching new performance assessments or competency frameworks; faculties needing to align on standards.
Format: Half-day to full-day workshops, customized to your school's focus areas; optional follow-up coaching sessions.
Comprehensive support to establish calibration as an ongoing practice across your school or district. This might include calibration sessions across elementary schools, middle school teams, or high school departments—building vertical alignment and horizontal consistency.
Best for: Schools and districts moving toward reliable competency-based systems; districts with multiple schools needing aligned expectations; systems committed to equity through consistent standards.
Format: Multi-session engagement over a school year, including facilitation, coaching, and capacity-building for internal sustainability
Photo by Allison Shelley/The Verbatim Agency for EDUimages
Calibration becomes even more powerful when students participate. Student co-design workshops engage students in analyzing work samples, discussing quality criteria, and giving input on learning expectations. This builds student agency while strengthening the authenticity of your standards.
Add-on a student co-design element to any calibration format.
Calibration work is customized to your context, goals, and timeline. Whether you're just beginning to build shared standards or deepening existing assessment systems, let's discuss how calibration can support your work.